Discussions

I’ve been running small sports advertising campaigns on and off for a while, and at some point I hit the same wall many others talk about. Google Ads just wasn’t an option anymore. Either the account got limited, disapproved, or never even approved in the first place. If you’ve worked in sports advertising, especially betting, fantasy, or anything even slightly related, you probably know that feeling already.

While searching around and reading what other people were doing, I stumbled on a simple sports advertising example that got me thinking differently about traffic sources. It didn’t magically solve everything, but it helped me understand that Google isn’t the only road, even if it feels like it sometimes.

The biggest pain point for me was consistency. With Google, once things work, they scale nicely. Without it, everything feels fragmented. Different dashboards, different rules, and a lot more guesswork. I remember thinking that all alternative PPC networks would just send junk traffic or bots, because that’s what people usually say in forums.

So I tested anyway. Not aggressively, just enough to see patterns. Some networks clearly didn’t work for sports advertising at all. The clicks were cheap, but nothing happened after that. No engagement, no time on site, nothing. It felt like throwing money into a hole, and I almost gave up after the first few tries.

What slowly changed my mind was lowering expectations and adjusting how I looked at results. Instead of comparing everything to Google performance, I started comparing platforms to each other. I noticed that certain PPC networks worked better for very specific sports niches. For example, some platforms performed better for live match content, while others made more sense for long-form sports blogs or prediction pages.

Another thing I learned the hard way is that creatives matter more outside Google. On Google, sometimes keywords do most of the work. On other PPC networks, the ad image or headline can completely make or break the campaign. I had ads that looked fine to me but got ignored, and simple ones that I almost didn’t care about ended up getting better clicks.

Targeting was also different. Instead of relying heavily on search intent, I had to think more about context and audience behavior. Sports fans browsing news sites or match schedules behave differently than someone actively searching on Google. Once I accepted that, the traffic started making more sense.

I wouldn’t say I found a perfect replacement for Google Ads. That doesn’t really exist. But I did find workable options that delivered steady traffic when managed properly. The key was patience. Results didn’t show up in a day or two. It took time to filter placements, block low-quality sources, and tweak ads.

What helped most was keeping campaigns simple. One offer, one landing page, and a clear idea of what kind of sports audience I was targeting. When I tried to do too much at once, everything fell apart. When I focused on just one angle, performance became easier to read and improve.

If you’re stuck because Google Ads isn’t available, my honest advice is not to panic and not to expect miracles. Alternative PPC networks can work for sports advertising, but only if you treat them differently. Test small, watch behavior closely, and don’t rely on clicks alone to judge success.

In the end, I see these platforms as support channels rather than replacements. They fill gaps, help maintain traffic flow, and sometimes even uncover new audience segments you wouldn’t reach on Google. It’s not perfect, but it’s far better than doing nothing and waiting for approvals that may never come.